do you think she'll have a wardrobe malfunction like Janet Jackson? ...
by the way the halftime show was booorrrrriiinnng! they should've put some energetic musician to spice up the place..
maybe if they can pull her away from her martini's long enough.
If Paula Abdul performs ....?sheet music opera theater
dont worry.
she didnt perform, some tom petty performed.
I read this article and it almost made me sick, who allows this to happen...
http://medsocial.com/blog.aspx?blogactio...
It really is a disgusting practice. Some villages see it as a girls rite of passage into womanhood. A girl who isn't circumcised isn't worth marrying.
Why do they perform Genital cutting on women in africa?headache opera theater
Some believe that it makes the women purer, cleaner and has some spiritual significance. But if you ask me, the whole practice barbaric and unnecessary.
They try to justify it in religious terms, but the practical result is a woman can no longer have an orgasm which pretty much puts a halt to any sexual enjoyment, thereby she is more likely to be chaste and less likely to stray once married. Being sexual and being a woman is a no no.
Yea, that's sick. I need my button, thank you very much!
Did anyone see the performance on TV? I saw him live at Walter Reed and I need to know if anyone recorded the same performance that was supposedly shown on TV. I looked all over youtube and can't find it.
Yes a lot of people saw it and a lot of people recorded it. If you join Mellencamp's Yahoo group, Human Wheels, they have a dvd tree going on over there. If you agree to copy it and pass it on to others, someone will send it to you.
http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/hum...
A piece of advice though, unless you want to make a lot of enemies fast, I'd leave the Cougar out of his name. That's a dirty word to the true mellenheads.
John Cougar Mellencamp performs at Walter Reed for soldiers..question!?plays opera theater
I saw that show and it was great.
My Answer ..ranked from first to last on who was best...
1. Day 26 ..... they sound great i will buy the album...they look good dancing too!
2. Danity Kane..... they look like porno girls..the image is wrong...and oh,,that song "Damaged" sucks a**!!! Its like a JLo song,,,always on for no good reason..its a bad song,,,i like more of their slower tempo sounds
3. Donnie...Poor him...that sound did not bring out the best inn him,,,i hope they modify his style before creating the album,,because the sound was not what i expected ...the beats in the show,,,where diff,,than thw sound he potrayed on the show,,,but i know that once they find the right sound 4 him,,he will be great..
P. Diddy.....and what made the performance or actually the song a major 2 thumbs down,,was when diddy came on...his verse was so week,his music sucked ***! i need a girl? ok he is a great creator..with a good ear for great sounds...but he should be a team player and learn to play his spot (great creator
Day 26- they always use that choreography dance routine when they perform i didnt really liked it they performed on 106 %26amp; park today and did the exact same thing it was kinda boring/lame plus i dont like there new son ne way
DK-Im not a fan But I love there new song and the video, there performance was great. I strongly agree though some the outfits where a little to revealing DAWN but other than that great performance
Donnie =[ i didnt get to see him perform but Im not feeling the song take you there? but I cat wait for his album they should have release Dr.Love great song
Mark Russell in bow tie and seated at a star-spangled piano used to have an ocassional PBS tv show. I think it used to be produced by WNED in Buffalo. I miss seeing it. Has he retired?
Looks like he still makes a few public performances.
http://www.markrussell.net/sched.htm
Mark Russell in bow tie and seated at a star-spangled piano used to have an ocassional PBS tv show. I think it used to be produced by WNED in Buffalo. I miss seeing it. Has he retired?
I think he does about one televised special a year now. He's a brilliant satirist.
Creationists assert that all the layers of the Grand Canyon were deposited in a single flood. For the cost of a few exhibits in the $27 million dollar Creation Museum, the scientists could mix the appropriate minerals in water and show they deposit in distinct strata. Why haven't they done this experiment?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geology_of_...
Stratification due to catastrophic geological events is indeed very observable and has been observed and documented on many occasions. One of the best documented being the recent Mt. St. Helens eruption:
http://www.icr.org/article/261/
http://www.creationism.org/sthelens/MSH1...
And that was a very small geologic occurrence compared to what could have happened during a massive ice and snow melt from the last ice age. Glacial lake flooding has been recently observed and documented, and there is geological evidence for it as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glacial_lak...
http://www.glaciallakemissoula.org/virtu...
Creating that in a lab or museum? It's kinda been done:
http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v11/i...
I don't know if they performed radiometric findings though. If you have any good articles on that, I would love to check them out.
I believe there is strong evidence for and against both catastrophism and uniformitarianism, and that both theories had a hand in the formation of today's earth geology.
***EDIT***
(Sighs), O.K., so this question is dealing with catastrophism vs. uniformitarianism and scientific theory and method, right? So why is everyone attacking the definition of "faith", discusing the veracity and historicity of ancient manuscripts, and name calling? If you guys ever expect a real dialogue on these issues, you'll have to stop the Ad Hominem, Appeal to Ridicule, Ignoratio Elenchi, and Red Herring arguments.
Oh, and btw, mentioning the "Creation Museum" is a Straw Man.
Aristotles fallacies presented by uniformitarianists: 6
Answers actually addressing the question: 1
It's another good question Novangelis, but the insulting remarks take all of the fun out of it.
Do "Scientific" Creationists perform experiments?opera score opera theaterThe Creation Museum is not a straw man. It does not misrepresent the opponent position as it is a forum for the opposition to present its position. I only mentioned the price tag because in a previous question about research, lack of funding for Creationists was cited. Report It
Because they have too much faith in their hypothesis to subject them to tests. Testing a hypothesis simply means you don't have enough faith to believe it without evidence.
What experiment can you do for biblegoddidit?
Here is a creationist experiment
Hypothesis-darwin was wrong
Experiment-Read the holy bible
Conclusion-God said it, I believe it, that settles it. Hypothesis proven
I am not familiar enough with any method undertaken by "Scientific" Creationists, but any experiment that would attempt to prove scientifically the value of an article of faith is, by its very nature, suspect.
I believe they call it 'Prayer'.
"Why haven't they done this experiment?"
Cos as soon as they start doing 'science' their methods and results can be questioned; they already know they are committing fraud but if nothing is on paper they can't be charged with anything.
Just cos they're morons doesn't mean they're morons. :)
No all they do is quote holy books all the time
Oh yes.---They have developed very accurate and sensitive instruments to measure the precise amount of holy manure it requires for a sermon to be effective.---Most T.V. Evangelists are using this technology today, and their collections have increased significantly.
The Creation Science Department is still working out the details of their Big Zap Theory, which they hope will counter the Big Bang Theory. --- They have a great array of scientific instruments at their disposal for testing this scientific break-through.
