Mark Russell in bow tie and seated at a star-spangled piano used to have an ocassional PBS tv show. I think it used to be produced by WNED in Buffalo. I miss seeing it. Has he retired?
Looks like he still makes a few public performances.
http://www.markrussell.net/sched.htm
Mark Russell in bow tie and seated at a star-spangled piano used to have an ocassional PBS tv show. I think it used to be produced by WNED in Buffalo. I miss seeing it. Has he retired?
I think he does about one televised special a year now. He's a brilliant satirist.
Creationists assert that all the layers of the Grand Canyon were deposited in a single flood. For the cost of a few exhibits in the $27 million dollar Creation Museum, the scientists could mix the appropriate minerals in water and show they deposit in distinct strata. Why haven't they done this experiment?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geology_of_...
Stratification due to catastrophic geological events is indeed very observable and has been observed and documented on many occasions. One of the best documented being the recent Mt. St. Helens eruption:
http://www.icr.org/article/261/
http://www.creationism.org/sthelens/MSH1...
And that was a very small geologic occurrence compared to what could have happened during a massive ice and snow melt from the last ice age. Glacial lake flooding has been recently observed and documented, and there is geological evidence for it as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glacial_lak...
http://www.glaciallakemissoula.org/virtu...
Creating that in a lab or museum? It's kinda been done:
http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v11/i...
I don't know if they performed radiometric findings though. If you have any good articles on that, I would love to check them out.
I believe there is strong evidence for and against both catastrophism and uniformitarianism, and that both theories had a hand in the formation of today's earth geology.
***EDIT***
(Sighs), O.K., so this question is dealing with catastrophism vs. uniformitarianism and scientific theory and method, right? So why is everyone attacking the definition of "faith", discusing the veracity and historicity of ancient manuscripts, and name calling? If you guys ever expect a real dialogue on these issues, you'll have to stop the Ad Hominem, Appeal to Ridicule, Ignoratio Elenchi, and Red Herring arguments.
Oh, and btw, mentioning the "Creation Museum" is a Straw Man.
Aristotles fallacies presented by uniformitarianists: 6
Answers actually addressing the question: 1
It's another good question Novangelis, but the insulting remarks take all of the fun out of it.
Do "Scientific" Creationists perform experiments?opera score opera theaterThe Creation Museum is not a straw man. It does not misrepresent the opponent position as it is a forum for the opposition to present its position. I only mentioned the price tag because in a previous question about research, lack of funding for Creationists was cited. Report It
Because they have too much faith in their hypothesis to subject them to tests. Testing a hypothesis simply means you don't have enough faith to believe it without evidence.
What experiment can you do for biblegoddidit?
Here is a creationist experiment
Hypothesis-darwin was wrong
Experiment-Read the holy bible
Conclusion-God said it, I believe it, that settles it. Hypothesis proven
I am not familiar enough with any method undertaken by "Scientific" Creationists, but any experiment that would attempt to prove scientifically the value of an article of faith is, by its very nature, suspect.
I believe they call it 'Prayer'.
"Why haven't they done this experiment?"
Cos as soon as they start doing 'science' their methods and results can be questioned; they already know they are committing fraud but if nothing is on paper they can't be charged with anything.
Just cos they're morons doesn't mean they're morons. :)
No all they do is quote holy books all the time
Oh yes.---They have developed very accurate and sensitive instruments to measure the precise amount of holy manure it requires for a sermon to be effective.---Most T.V. Evangelists are using this technology today, and their collections have increased significantly.
The Creation Science Department is still working out the details of their Big Zap Theory, which they hope will counter the Big Bang Theory. --- They have a great array of scientific instruments at their disposal for testing this scientific break-through.
I was going to a show and was wondering how long it may take to see the headlining bands, the reason why I'm going... Funeral For A Friend is the main performance, and it's Alexisonfire, Emanuel, and Fightstar headlining =)
It will probably take 1 to 1.5 hours for the opening bands to finish. You do realize that if a band is headlining then it is the main event...right? It sounds like Funeral For a Friend is the headliner and the other bands are opening for Funeral For a Friend.
Do headlining bands perform before the main performance?palace theatre opera theater
***THE OPENING ACT WILL PROBABLY BE ON STAGE FOR AT LEAST AN HOUR.***
There was this one time that the killers sang their song mr. brightside and it at a party and they were by the pool. I think it was live for some show, does anybody know what show?
It was at the VMA's last year on MTV. :)
Does anyone know what event the killers performed mr. brightside by a pool?regal theater opera theater
no one cares
no
I think at a New year's bash a few years ago. I remember watching it but I really dot remember where. Jon Bon Jovi played at the same event.
but when iam using find(l_MIN),Referenced object 'find' is not a member of class __rw_tree_iter%26lt;std::pair%26lt;const std::basic_string%26lt;char,std::char_traits%26lt;... %26gt;,long%26gt;,long,std::pair%26lt;const...message is given.And l_MIN
value is a string and so it need to convert it.so iam using find(l_MIN.c_str() which is also showing an error.
This is telling you that the object you're referencing (find) is not a menber of the parent class. In other words, the function you're calling "find" is not valid. Make sure you are including the proper libraries, name spaces, etc. (depending on the language you're using).
Let's see........I'm a week late. I know it doesn't seem like a long time, but I've never been late before in my life. I'm 32 years old. I have two kids and had a tubal perfomed 9 years ago after my 2nd was born. I'm having some symptoms of pregnancy. I've been really tired, moody, my boobs are very sensitive and sore, my side hurts a little, and my back hurts too. I know these could also be signs of starting too......its just like I said I'm NEVER late! I haven't been stressed or changed my diet or execercised more or anything that would cause me to be late. Has anyone ever heard of anyone getting pregnant that long after a tubal? Also, if I do a home pregnancy test how far along would I have to be for it to show positive? It's been a long time since I was pregnant. :0(
Yes! I was told the odds for getting pregnant after tubal were 1 in 200. And I met a woman who got pregnant after 12 years of having her tubal!! So go get a home pregnancy test! They are acurate and can test pretty early anymore. Just check label for how soon.
Can I be pregnant after tubal ligation performed 9 years ago?state theatre opera theater
I don't think you can I have had mine for 16 years, but you may want to see your doctor, and you might think you aren't stressed but you might be.
yes u can trust me i got one now i'm due in may
